![]() This, ladies and gentleman, is a subterfuge. Today’s leading convention proponents - Mark Meckler, Mark Levin, Michael Farris, and leftist Harvard Law Professor Lawrence “Larry” Lessig - however, contend that what they seek is not a “constitutional convention” but a “convention of states,” which they claim to be entirely different from the former. In 1979, the late Senator Barry Goldwater warned, “If we hold a constitutional convention, every group in the country - majority, minority, middle-of-the-road, left, right, up, down - is going to get its two bits in and we are going to wind up with a constitution that will be so far different from the one we have lived under for 200 years that I doubt that the Republic could continue.” Undoubtedly, a modern-day convention, presumably “limited” to just one (i.e., Balanced Budget Amendment, or BBA Wolf-PAC’s proposed campaign finance reform amendment to overturn Citizens United congressional term limits or a few proposed amendments purportedly intended to restrain the federal government, such as by COS Action/COS Project) would open up the Constitution to drastic revision. And stopping a Con-Con remains one of the most, if not the most, important task for us in 2022 in order to keep our Republic. Constitution, under Article V, also known as a constitutional convention (Con-Con) or “convention of states.” This success is thanks largely to your efforts in stopping them. In 2021, as of December 13, despite the vigorous efforts of Convention of States Action (COS Action/COS Project), not a single state passed one of their resolutions applying to Congress to call “a Convention for proposing Amendments” to the U.S. Onward: Stopping the COS/Con-Con and their Lies in 2022īy Christian Gomez, Research Project Manager Rein In Big Government With Nullification.Stop a Constitutional Convention: Video.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |